PulseAugur
EN
LIVE 15:08:42

AI researchers seek guidance on paper review scores and rebuttal strategies

By PulseAugur Editorial · [1 sources] ·

A user on the r/MachineLearning subreddit is seeking advice regarding their first paper submission to ARR (likely referring to a conference or journal like ACL/IJCNLP). The paper, focused on Multilingualism and Cross-Lingual NLP, received average review scores of 2.83 with a confidence score of 3.33. The user is asking for insights on whether this score is competitive for the target venue, how outlier reviews are weighted in meta-reviews, the potential impact of rebuttals, and tips for crafting an effective rebuttal. AI

RANK_REASON User is asking questions about the peer review process for an academic paper, not announcing a new development.

Read on r/MachineLearning →

AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →

AI researchers seek guidance on paper review scores and rebuttal strategies

COVERAGE [1]

  1. r/MachineLearning TIER_1 Français(FR) · /u/hepiga ·

    First time ARR users - some questions [D]

    <!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>We submitted our first paper to ARR, intending to commit to IJCNLP-AACL. Area: Multilingualism and Cross-Lingual NLP</p> <p>Scores: (3,4) (2.5,3) (3,3) - average 2.83 for reviews, 3.33 for confidence</p> <p>3 for soundness on all, 4 for reproduci…

RELATED ENTITIES

RELATED TOPICS