PulseAugur
EN
LIVE 21:27:28

User distills DeepSeek V4 Pro into Gemma 26B MoE and 12B dense models

A user detailed their process of distilling the DeepSeek V4 Pro model into two versions of Gemma: a 26B parameter MoE model and a 12B parameter dense model. The distillation process, which involved repopulating Natural Questions QA pairs, cost $0.36 for the DeepSeek API calls. The user encountered bugs with Unsloth Studio but eventually managed to train the models on a server with two RTX 3090 GPUs. The 26B model consumed more VRAM and achieved a lower training loss, indicating better knowledge absorption, though the evaluation gap between the two models was small. The 12B model was faster and had higher per-GPU throughput. AI

IMPACT Demonstrates practical techniques for model distillation and fine-tuning, potentially informing future open-source model development.

RANK_REASON User-led research and experimentation with model distillation and fine-tuning. [lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=1.0]

Read on r/LocalLLaMA →

AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →

User distills DeepSeek V4 Pro into Gemma 26B MoE and 12B dense models

COVERAGE [1]

  1. r/LocalLLaMA TIER_1 English(EN) · /u/Paramecium_caudatum_ ·

    Distilled DeepSeek into Gemma 4 26B-A4B vs 12B. Not very useful, but I learned a lot.

    <table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1ur1i1a/distilled_deepseek_into_gemma_4_26ba4b_vs_12b_not/"> <img alt="Distilled DeepSeek into Gemma 4 26B-A4B vs 12B. Not very useful, but I learned a lot." src="https://preview.redd.it/irn879iku1ch1.png?widt…