Generative AI risks to legal privilege detailed in new arXiv paper

A new paper published on arXiv explores the confidentiality and legal privilege risks associated with generative AI systems. It details how data is stored and processed through model parameters, context windows, and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), highlighting unique risks for each. The analysis draws on legal precedents from the UK and US, alongside computer science research, to guide legal professionals in England and Wales on effective data governance and potential negligence in the deployment of GenAI. AI

IMPACT Highlights evolving data governance standards and potential negligence risks for legal professionals using generative AI.

RANK_REASON The cluster contains a research paper published on arXiv discussing AI safety and legal implications. [lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=1.0]

Read on arXiv cs.AI →

• arXiv
• England and Wales
• generative artificial intelligence
• Hugging Face
• retrieval-augmented generation
• Sra
• UK and Munir v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• United States v. Heppner

• paper
• safety

AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →