PulseAugur
EN
LIVE 02:55:03

Fable AI model excels in NYT Connections puzzle benchmark

A user on Reddit shared results from a benchmark called connections-bench, which tests how well AI models can solve the New York Times Connections puzzle. The model 'Fable' performed exceptionally well, with Anthropic's Sonnet 5 and another model, glm-5.2, also showing strong results. OpenAI's GPT-5.5 was nearly on par with Fable, while Haiku struggled, and gpt-4.1-mini performed poorly. AI

IMPACT Provides insight into the puzzle-solving capabilities of various LLMs, highlighting relative strengths and weaknesses.

RANK_REASON User-generated benchmark results shared on Reddit, not an official release or research paper.

Read on r/Anthropic →

AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →

Fable AI model excels in NYT Connections puzzle benchmark

COVERAGE [1]

  1. r/Anthropic TIER_1 English(EN) · /u/NatteringNabob69 ·

    connections-bench - How does Fable compare one-shotting NYT Connections?

    <table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Anthropic/comments/1up24r8/connectionsbench_how_does_fable_compare/"> <img alt="connections-bench - How does Fable compare one-shotting NYT Connections?" src="https://preview.redd.it/rw1ezs35xmbh1.png?width=140&amp;height=81&amp;…