PulseAugur
EN
LIVE 23:51:51

LLM security: Guardrails for untrusted input in Python and Java

This series of posts introduces the concept of a "trust boundary" in LLM applications, highlighting that any data crossing into or out of the model is untrusted. It details three primary areas where untrusted input can enter: user input, retrieved content (like in RAG), and model output. The articles provide code examples in Python and Java demonstrating how to defend against prompt injection and other vulnerabilities using a SAFE pattern, which involves clearly delimiting data within the system prompt to distinguish it from instructions. AI

IMPACT Enhances the security and reliability of LLM applications by providing concrete patterns for handling untrusted data.

RANK_REASON The articles provide practical code examples and patterns for securing LLM applications, focusing on input validation and prompt injection defense.

Read on dev.to — LLM tag →

AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 2 sources. How we write summaries →

LLM security: Guardrails for untrusted input in Python and Java

COVERAGE [2]

  1. dev.to — LLM tag TIER_1 English(EN) · Puneet Gupta ·

    Guardrails for LLM Apps in Python

    <h2> Introduction </h2> <p>Every post in this series has quietly touched a piece of the same problem. <a href="https://pg-blogs.netlify.app/posts/15-building-agentic-workflows-in-python/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Building Agentic Workflows in Python</a> said a tool's <code>input…

  2. dev.to — LLM tag TIER_1 English(EN) · Puneet Gupta ·

    Guardrails for LLM Apps in Java

    <h2> Introduction </h2> <p>Every post in this series has quietly touched a piece of the same problem. <a href="https://pg-blogs.netlify.app/posts/14-building-agentic-workflows-in-java/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Building Agentic Workflows in Java</a> said <code>toolUse.input()</c…