A new paper revises the RVL-CDIP dataset, a popular benchmark for document classifiers, by identifying and correcting label errors and test-train overlap. The analysis revealed approximately 12% label errors and 35% test-train duplication within the original dataset. Modifications to the dataset showed that removing label errors improved classification accuracy, while removing duplicates led to a decrease. Furthermore, training on the corrected data significantly enhanced out-of-distribution generalization, with supervised models achieving an average accuracy increase of 8.1 percentage points on the RVL-CDIP-N benchmark. AI
IMPACT Improved dataset quality for document classification benchmarks may lead to more reliable model evaluations and better out-of-distribution generalization.
RANK_REASON The cluster contains an academic paper detailing dataset revisions and benchmark analysis.
AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 2 sources. How we write summaries →