A PhD student, whose paper was rejected by MICCAI despite a reviewer noting its novelty, is seeking advice on the best publication strategy. They are considering whether to revise and submit directly to a journal or first present at a workshop like MLCN or iMIMIC before a journal submission. The student is not currently pursuing a PhD and is weighing the long-term benefits of a journal publication against the perceived suboptimality of workshops. AI
RANK_REASON The cluster discusses a rejected academic paper and publication strategy, fitting the research bucket. [lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=1.0]
AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →
