PulseAugur
EN
LIVE 22:58:09

PhD student seeks advice on publishing rejected MICCAI paper

By PulseAugur Editorial · [1 sources] ·

A PhD student, whose paper was rejected by MICCAI despite a reviewer noting its novelty, is seeking advice on the best publication strategy. They are considering whether to revise and submit directly to a journal or first present at a workshop like MLCN or iMIMIC before a journal submission. The student is not currently pursuing a PhD and is weighing the long-term benefits of a journal publication against the perceived suboptimality of workshops. AI

RANK_REASON The cluster discusses a rejected academic paper and publication strategy, fitting the research bucket. [lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=1.0]

Read on r/MachineLearning →

AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →

PhD student seeks advice on publishing rejected MICCAI paper

How we ranked this

Signal score
0 / 100
Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
Newsworthiness bucket
Tool
The cluster discusses a rejected academic paper and publication strategy, fitting the research bucket. [lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=1.0]
Source corroboration
Single-source cluster
Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
Topics
paper
Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
AI-industry relevance
High
Clearly on-topic for AI-industry coverage.
Story freshness
101 days old
Aged out of breaking-news scoring windows; ranking reflects the durable signal from the full source set.

Full methodology in our editorial standards.

COVERAGE [1]

  1. r/MachineLearning TIER_1 English(EN) · /u/KingPowa ·

    Rejected MICCAI paper: workshop -> journal/conference or directly journal/conference [R]

    <!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Premise: this work is my first year PhD, and I dropped out for personal reasons. I still want to do research but independently.</p> <p>I have tried to submit my explainability paper to MICCAI. Sadly, for doubtful/good reasons, it got rejected.</p…

RELATED TOPICS