PulseAugur
EN
LIVE 00:28:10

Data mining conference reviewer seeks guidance on double-blind submissions in single-blind tracks

By PulseAugur Editorial · [1 sources] ·

A Reddit user serving as a first-time reviewer for data mining conferences is seeking guidance on how to handle submissions that are double-blind when the conference track specifies single-blind submissions. The user is unsure whether these submissions should be rejected outright or if there's a different protocol for managing them. AI

RANK_REASON The cluster discusses a procedural question about academic paper submissions, not a core AI development or industry event.

Read on r/MachineLearning →

AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →

Data mining conference reviewer seeks guidance on double-blind submissions in single-blind tracks

COVERAGE [1]

  1. r/MachineLearning TIER_1 English(EN) · /u/d_edge_sword ·

    Double-Blind submission in single-blind tracks [D]

    <!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Hi everyone.</p> <p>First-time reviewer for data mining venues here.</p> <p>For the applied tracks in ICDM and KDD, the CFP states submissions should be single-blind, showing the author's name and affiliations.</p> <p>I received some submissions …

RELATED ENTITIES

RELATED TOPICS