PulseAugur
LIVE 10:18:22
research · [4 sources] ·
0
research

Researchers propose novel splitting techniques for complex argumentation frameworks

Two new papers explore advanced splitting techniques for argumentation frameworks to improve computational efficiency. The first paper focuses on Assumption-Based Argumentation Frameworks (ABAFs), proposing splitting on the knowledge base rather than its graph instantiation to handle computational complexity. The second paper introduces novel splitting methods for bipolar set-based argumentation frameworks (BSAFs), which incorporate both collective attacks and supports, generalizing existing techniques. AI

Summary written by gemini-2.5-flash-lite from 4 sources. How we write summaries →

IMPACT These papers introduce novel computational techniques for argumentation frameworks, potentially improving the efficiency of AI systems that rely on logical reasoning and debate modeling.

RANK_REASON The cluster contains two academic papers published on arXiv.

Read on arXiv cs.AI →

COVERAGE [4]

  1. arXiv cs.AI TIER_1 · Giovanni Buraglio, Wolfgang Dvorak, Stefan Woltran ·

    Splitting Assumption-Based Argumentation Frameworks

    arXiv:2604.27964v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Assumption-Based Argumentation (ABA) is a well-established formalism for modelling and reasoning over debates, with a wide range of applications. However, the high computational complexity of core reasoning tasks in ABA poses a sign…

  2. arXiv cs.AI TIER_1 · Matti Berthold, Lydia Bl\"umel, Giovanni Buraglio, Anna Rapberger ·

    Splitting Argumentation Frameworks with Collective Attacks and Supports

    arXiv:2604.28112v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This work proposes novel splitting techniques for argumentation formalisms that incorporate supports between defeasible elements. We base our studies on bipolar set-based argumentation frameworks (BSAFs) which generalize argumentati…

  3. arXiv cs.AI TIER_1 · Anna Rapberger ·

    Splitting Argumentation Frameworks with Collective Attacks and Supports

    This work proposes novel splitting techniques for argumentation formalisms that incorporate supports between defeasible elements. We base our studies on bipolar set-based argumentation frameworks (BSAFs) which generalize argumentation frameworks with collective attacks (SETAFs), …

  4. arXiv cs.AI TIER_1 · Stefan Woltran ·

    Splitting Assumption-Based Argumentation Frameworks

    Assumption-Based Argumentation (ABA) is a well-established formalism for modelling and reasoning over debates, with a wide range of applications. However, the high computational complexity of core reasoning tasks in ABA poses a significant challenge for its applicability. This is…