A theoretical note published on arXiv explores the finite axiomatizability of strict majority reasoning within finite social decision frames. Researchers Moss and Pedersen previously introduced a coherence criterion for representing majority judgments with a finitely additive measure. This new work proves that this criterion cannot be replaced by any bounded finite fragment in the finite setting. The study constructs a maximal standard frame for every k >= 1, demonstrating that there is no uniform finite bound on the incoherence index of social decision frames, thus resolving a conjecture. AI
RANK_REASON Academic paper published on arXiv detailing theoretical findings in economics. [lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=0.1]
AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →
