Large Language Models (LLMs) assisting with coding are comparable to second-year apprentices, according to an experienced IT trainer. The trainer emphasizes that critical code should not be released without supervision, a mistake often made with LLMs. Constant monitoring of LLM-generated code is necessary, as it does not inherently speed up the development process. AI
IMPACT Highlights the need for human oversight in AI-assisted coding, suggesting current LLMs are not yet autonomous for critical tasks.
RANK_REASON Opinion piece comparing LLM capabilities to human apprentices.
Read on Mastodon — fosstodon.org →
AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →
