Researchers have benchmarked State-Space Models (SSMs), specifically Mamba, against Transformers and BiLSTMs for Optical Character Recognition (OCR) on historical newspapers. The studies indicate that while Mamba-based models offer significant computational advantages, halving inference time and showing better memory scaling, they achieve slightly lower accuracy on severely degraded text compared to Transformer-based models. Further ablation studies suggest that Mamba's performance on longer sequences, like paragraphs, is highly dependent on hyperparameter tuning and can be data-hungry, lagging behind Transformers on real handwriting, though it remains faster on clean synthetic text. AI
IMPACT Mamba offers computational efficiency for OCR, but Transformers remain superior for accuracy on challenging handwriting and long sequences.
RANK_REASON Two research papers comparing State-Space Models (Mamba) against Transformers and BiLSTMs for OCR tasks.
- arXiv
- IAM
- Mamba
- Merveilles Agbeti-Messan
- OCR
- State-Space Models
- Transformer
- BiLSTM
- Gemini
- historical newspapers
- National Library of Luxembourg
- PERO-OCR
- Tesseract
- transformers
- TrOCR
AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 2 sources. How we write summaries →