What about OpenCL and CUDA C++ alternatives?
While OpenCL and other C++ based GPU programming models like SYCL were designed for portability and saw broad adoption, they failed to become dominant AI compute platforms. Key issues included the slow pace of committee-driven development, leading to a lack of rapid feature iteration and vendor-specific extensions. Furthermore, the inherent tensions of 'open coopetition' among hardware vendors, where innovation was kept secret, hindered the evolution of these standards to meet the rapidly changing demands of AI. AI
IMPACT Explains why established GPU programming standards like OpenCL did not succeed in AI, offering lessons for future portable compute efforts.